No 4: Practice
In practice, MPs are well-equipped to scrutinize the budget and have access to and engage with a wide range of internal and external sources of expertise and advice on budgetary matters.
In practice, MPs are well-equipped to scrutinize the budget and have access to and engage with a wide range of internal and external sources of expertise and advice on budgetary matters.
MPs have access to specialized training to build capacity to scrutinize the budget.
Parliament routinely engages with external sources of expertise throughout the budget cycle, and seeks to gain a perspective on how the budget impacts different groups in society.
Parliament has a parliamentary budget office or other specialized support service that has sufficient funding and expertise to provide expert support and advice on budgetary matters.
In practice, the PAC plays an active role in parliament’s scrutiny of the budget. It regularly informs parliament and the public about the outcomes of its budget scrutiny.
The PAC is adequately resourced to enable it to exercise its mandate on behalf of parliament.
Entities funded by the budget are required to provide the PAC with records and information about their budgets and performance. Such information is readily accessible to parliament.
Parliament’s rules of procedure require that opposition and/or minority parties be represented proportionally in the membership of the PAC and, ideally, that the PAC be chaired by a member of these parties.
URL copied to clipboard
Delve into the Indicators for Democratic Parliaments, assess current capacity and practice in parliament, and start tracking progress towards the aspiring goals.
Read the assessment guidance to find out what to consider when conducting an assessment against the Indicators. Find out how to prepare, how to set the objectives of the assessment, how to organize the process, and more. Contact the project partners for expert advice.