No 5: Use of ordinary versus fast-track procedures

In practice, most legislation is subject to ordinary procedure and parliament does not unduly rely on the use of fast-track procedure.

No 4: Fast-track procedure

Where there is a fast-track procedure for the urgent consideration of legislation, such procedure provides MPs with the opportunity to debate, amend and vote on the urgent legislation, and for reasonable scrutiny mechanisms, such as inserting obligatory post-legislative scrutiny after a period of time, or using sunset clauses.

No 3: Committee stage

As part of the ordinary procedure, all proposals for laws are referred to one or more relevant committees for detailed consideration and amendment. This committee stage also includes expert and public consultations.

No 2: Ordinary procedure

The legal framework provides for the use of ordinary legislative procedure as a rule. This procedure includes, as a minimum, general debate on legislation with reasonable time allocated to MPs to prepare and participate in the debate, and opportunities to consider the details of legislation and to propose and vote on amendments. 

No 1: Clear provisions for the passage of legislation

The legal framework sets out clear provisions for the passage of legislation through parliament, including through both houses in bicameral systems. The procedures provide mechanisms for the resolution of differences between the houses in bicameral systems.

No 4: Ease of constitution-making or amendment

In practice, the constitution is not so difficult to amend that constitutional change is impossible to achieve, but not so easy to amend as to threaten its protection of the democratic system as well as minority and other rights.

No 3: Adoption

The constitution and/or other aspects of the legal framework establish that parliament must approve a new constitution or a constitutional amendment, ideally by a supermajority.

No 2: Public consultations

Broad public consultations, with reasonably extensive time frames, are undertaken after the initiation of constitutional amendments.

No 1: Initiation of constitutional amendments

The constitution and/or other aspects of the legal framework establish a range of mechanisms for initiating constitutional amendments, including initiation by MPs and citizen-initiated proposals.

Based on a global comparative analysis, an aspiring goal for parliaments in the area of “constitution-making and amendment” is as follows:

  • The constitution and/or other aspects of the legal framework establish a range of mechanisms for initiating constitutional amendments, including initiation by MPs and citizen-initiated proposals.
  • Broad public consultations, with reasonably extensive time frames, are required after the initiation of constitutional amendments.
  • The constitution and/or other aspects of the legal framework establish that parliament must approve a new constitution or a constitutional amendment, ideally by a supermajority. There may also be other special or additional requirements. 
     

URL copied to clipboard

All indicators

Delve into the Indicators for Democratic Parliaments, assess current capacity and practice in parliament, and start tracking progress towards the aspiring goals.

Download all indicators

Need help organizing an assessment?

Read the assessment guidance to find out what to consider when conducting an assessment against the Indicators. Find out how to prepare, how to set the objectives of the assessment, how to organize the process, and more. Contact the project partners for expert advice.

Download assessment guidance

Get expert advice