Dimension: 1.7.1 Election and dismissal of the executive

This dimension concerns three key parliamentary powers relating to the election and dismissal of the executive, namely:

  • to elect a Head of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used.
  • to hold a vote of confidence in the executive
  • to censure or impeach a Head of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used. and/or ministers.

Various political systems provide for different mandates for parliaments with regard to these powers. The mandate of parliament is typically defined in the constitution and further developed in laws and in parliament’s rules of procedure.

In some countries, parliament may play a direct role in electing the Heads of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used. , while in others parliament has a limited or no role in the process. The meaning of “vote of confidence in the executive” also varies across political systems, for the purposes of this dimension, it refers to parliament’s power to withdraw confidence if it considers that the executive as a whole, or some of its members, are failing to carry out their duties.

In parliamentary systems, the executive’s tenure usually depends on the continued support of parliament, which therefore has the power to bring down the executive by a vote of no confidence where necessary. In such systems, there should be clear criteria and rules on the nomination of candidates for Head of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used. and members of cabinet, proceedings for the debate of a proposed government programme and the composition of the cabinet, related deadlines, and the minimum quorum necessary for gaining parliamentary confidence in the executive.

In presidential systems, the directly elected Head of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used. is still accountable to citizens between elections. Parliament Parliament A national body of elected (or sometimes appointed) representatives that makes laws, debates issues and holds the government to account. usually has the power to approve ministers and cabinet members individually, and there should be clear rules for the submission of candidates for approval, hearing procedures and a minimal quorum for final decision. Parliament Parliament A national body of elected (or sometimes appointed) representatives that makes laws, debates issues and holds the government to account. typically also has mechanisms to impeach the Head of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used. and/or ministers for breaches of their constitutional duty or for unlawful conduct.

Regardless of the specifics of each country, it is important that parliamentary powers in these areas be clearly set out in the legal framework, and that procedures are clearly defined and consistently applied in practice.

Show more Show less

Aspiring goal

Based on a global comparative analysis, an aspiring goal for parliaments in the area of “election and dismissal of the executive” is as follows:

  • The constitution clearly establishes the mandate of parliament concerning its powers:
    • to elect the Head of State/Government
    • to hold a vote of confidence in the executive
    • to censure or impeach the Head of State/Government and/or ministers
  • The procedure for applying these powers is clearly established in law and in practice. 

Assess your parliament against this dimension

Assessment criteria

No 1: Election of the Head of State/Government

The constitution lays down clear criteria and rules for the election of the Head of State/Government and, where relevant, the role that parliament plays in this election. 

No 2: Votes of confidence in the executive

In systems where the executive requires parliamentary confidence in order to govern, the legal framework lays down clear rules and criteria for the establishment of such confidence. In systems not based on parliamentary confidence, parliament approves ministers and cabinet members individually.

No 3: Censure or impeachment of the executive

Parliament has the power to remove the Head of State/Government and/or ministers for breaches of their constitutional duty or for unlawful conduct through processes of censure or impeachment. The rules and criteria for such processes are clearly set out in the legal framework and in parliament’s rules of procedure. 

No 4: Practice

In practice, the procedures for electing the Head of State/Government, for holding a vote of confidence in the executive, and for censuring or impeaching the Head of State/Government and/or ministers are applied consistently and in accordance with the relevant provisions of the constitution and other aspects of the legal framework. 

How to complete this assessment

This dimension is assessed against several criteria, each of which should be evaluated separately. For each criterion, select one of the six descriptive grades (Non-existent, Rudimentary, Basic, Good, Very good and Excellent) that best reflects the situation in your parliament, and provide details of the evidence on which this assessment is based. =

The evidence for assessment of this dimension could include the following:

  • Provisions of the constitution and/or other aspects of the legal framework relating to the procedures for electing the Head of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used. , for holding a vote of confidence in the executive, and for censuring or impeaching the Head of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used. and/or ministers
  • Provisions of parliament’s rules of procedure relating to the procedures for electing the Head of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used. , for holding a vote of confidence in the executive, and for censuring or impeaching the Head of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used. and/or ministers
  • Examples of decisions by parliament or its committees relating to confidence or no confidence in the executive, and to the censure or impeachment of the Head of State/ Government Government See: Executive. Note: In this publication, the terms “government” and “executive” are used interchangeably, and the traditional definition of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) is not used. and/or ministers

Where relevant, provide additional comments or examples that support the assessment.

Download this indicator

Get help with this assessment

The assessment of indicators involves diagnosing and considering strengths and weaknesses, i.e. the things parliament is doing well, and the things it could do better or more effectively, taking into account established good practices that are described in the indicators. 

Read the assessment guidance to find out what to consider when conducting an assessment against the Indicators. Find out how to prepare, how to set the objectives of the assessment, how to organize the process, and more. Contact the project partners for expert advice.

Download assessment guidanceGet expert advice

URL copied to clipboard